Safety and Efficacy of Water Fluoridation
Terrance Morton, MPH student
Walden University
PH 6165-7: Aspects of Environmental Health
Instructor: Dr. Rebecca J. Heick
Spring, 2009
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (1999), fluoridation of water is considered one of the greatest achievements in public health. Water fluoridation has been shown to reduce the incidence of dental caries, improve overall dental health and reduce the cost of dental care. An economic analysis conducted by the CDC in 2001, showed that the average cost of water fluoridation is approximately 50 cents per person for a large community (20,000 people). For every dollar spent on water fluoridation there is a $38 savings in dentalcare expenditures. The Journal of Dental Research (April 2000) stated that fluoride use has reduced the cost of oral health care in the United States by $40 billion dollars in the past 40 years (Clarkson et al, 2000) and in 2004, the CDC estimated that $78 billion was spent on dentalcare services. The average cost in the United States to fill one cavity is approximately $65, which is the cost to provide fluoridation for an individual for a lifetime (CDC, 2009).
Not only is community water fluoridation cost effective, it is also safe when used in the right concentration to protect the teeth from dental caries. The recommended concentration to prevent dental decay is 0.7-1.2 parts per million according to the American Dental Association (2002). Concentrations above this may cause fluorosis, which appears as white streaks on the teeth. This is usually seen in children under the age of five. In the more severe form of this condition, black or brown spots may be seen. This condition can be reduced or avoided by monitoring the amount of fluoride that children receive or use.
The American Dental Association has been a major endorser of the practice of water fluoridation for over 40 years due to the benefits of cavity reductions and improvement in dental health. Fluoride provides protection by preventing the acid produced by plaque from demineralizing tooth enamel (CDC, 2009). At present, more than two thirds of children and 91% of adults experience tooth decay. Since the addition of fluoride to water and other products such as toothpaste, dental rinses and fluoride treatments by dental professionals there has been an 18-40% reduction in tooth decay (CDC, 2009).
I believe it is more effective to fluoridate community water than to pay higher prices towards the treatment of dentalcaries. The practice of fluoridating community water is a cost effective, safe, and wise procedure to perform. In these times of financial hardships for the public, every dollar saved on healthcare expenses can be used towards other necessities. With more and more people becoming unemployed and losing health benefits, the cost of a doctor or dentist visit is becoming more expensive for those who still have medical and dental coverage. Fluoridation of community water has shown to be a very cost effective method of reducing those factors that increase the need for extensive dental treatment. According to a study performed by the Louisiana Department of Health (MMWR, 1999), treatment of children with dentalcaries can be expensive and may include procedures done in hospital operating rooms. Many of these children are of low income. For those children living in areas where water in not fluoridated the cost can be three times as much compared to those children who live in areas that have fluoridated water. The funds to provide for these dental services come from state Medicaid funds. With the addition of fluoride to all communities, the cost of dental services would be reduced along with a reduction in dental problems.
References
American Dental Association (2000). American Dental Association Statement on
Water Fluoridation Efficacy and Safety. Retrieved April 11, 2009 from
http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/statements/fluoride2.asp
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (1999). Ten Greatest Public Health
Achievements—United States-1900-1999. Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report 48(12): 241-243
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2009). Community Water
Fluoridation. Retrieved April 11, 2009 from
http://www.cdc.gov/Fluoridation/faq.htm#2
Clarkson, J., Hardwick, K., Barnes, D., Richardson, L., & Cohen, L., (2000).
Internationalcollaborative research on fluoride. Journal of Dental
Research 79(4): 893
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (1999). Water Fluoridation and Costs of
Medicaid Treatment for Dental Decay—Louisiana, 1995-1996. Retrieved
April 16, 2009 from
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4834a2.htm
Filed under: PUBH 6165/8165 EH Service-based learning activities
Fluoridation is Ineffective & Harmful, studies show
Opposition: Scientific, Respectable & Growing
Over 2,440 professionals urge the US Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted, citing scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. See statement: http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html.
Also, eleven Environmental Protection Agency employee unions representing over 7000 environmental and public health professionals called for a moratorium on drinking water fluoridation programs across the country, and have asked EPA management to recognize fluoride as posing a serious risk of causing cancer in people. (1a)
Last election day, 53 US cities rejected fluoridation joining a growing list of communities saying “No,” to fluoridation. (1)
Since the professionals’ statement was first issued (Aug 2007), the following occurred:
– The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Canada’s leading voice on environmental health issues, released a statement opposing fluoridation. (2)
– The National Kidney Foundation dropped its fluoridation support replacing it with this caution: “Individuals with CKD [Chronic Kidney Disease] should be notified of the potential risk of fluoride exposure.” (3)
– Researchers reporting in the Oct 6 2007 British Medical Journal indicate that fluoridation never was proven safe or effective and may be unethical. (4)
– “A qualitative review of …studies found a consistent and strong association between the exposure to fluoride and low IQ,” concluded Tang el al., in “Fluoride and Children’s Intelligence: A Meta-analysis” in Biological Trace Element Research (5)
– Scientific American editors wrote in January 2008, “Some recent studies suggest that over-consumption of fluoride can raise the risks of disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain and the thyroid gland”
– Dr. A. K. Susheela, a leading fluoride expert, explains in a video why US physicians overlook fluoride as a possible cause of diseases commonly caused by fluoride. http://tinyurl.com/Susheela
– A study in the Fall 2008 Journal of Public Health Dentistry reveals that cavity-free teeth have little to do with fluoride intake. Researchers report, “The benefits of fluoride are mostly topical…while fluorosis is clearly more dependent on fluoride intake.”
A Tennessee State legislator who is also an MD is urging all Tennessee Water Districts to stop fluoridation, reported a Tennessee newspaper on 11/29/08. At least 30 Tennessee water districts have already complied with his request.(6)
On 1/5/09, the Burlington Board of Health recommended that Burlington cease fluoridation because fluoridation can harm some people. (7)
On 1/6/09, a Canadian town, Drayton, stopped fluoridation, not to save money, but because it was in the best interests of residents, said the Mayor. (8)
On 2/10/2009 Skagit County, WA officials reversed their 2007 fluoridation decision. (9)
On 3/3/2009, Plainfield, Vermont bans fluoridation. (10)
The Arkansas Oral Health Director is accused of giving eight “false or misleading statements” on fluoridation to an Arkansas legislative Committee. (12)
Signers to the FAN statement include:
— Dr. Arvid Carlsson,winner of the 2000 Nobel Prize for Medicine
— Vyvyan Howard, MD, PhD, President, International Society of Doctors for the Environment
— Ken Cook and Richard Wiles, Environmental Working Group
— Lois Gibbs, Center for Health, Environment, and Justice
— Joseph Mercola, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, who runs the #1 most visited natural health website
— Theo Colborn, PhD, co-author, “Our Stolen Future”
— Sam Epstein, MD, Chairman, Cancer Prevention Coalition
— The current and six past Presidents of the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology
— Board of Directors (2007), American Academy of Environmental Medicine
— FIVE Goldman Prize winners – given for excellence in protecting the environment
— Three members of the prestigious 2006 National Research Council (NRC) panel that reported on fluoride’s toxicology
— Three officers in the Union representing professionals at EPA headquarters
— Hundreds of medical, dental, academic, scientific and environmental professionals, worldwide.
Nobel Prize winner, Dr. Arvid Carlsson, says, “Fluoridation is against all principles of modern pharmacology. It’s really obsolete.”
An Online Action Petition to Congress in support of the Professionals’ Statement is available on FAN’s web site, http://congress.fluorideaction.net
Fluoride jeopardizes health – even at low levels deliberately added to public water supplies, according to data presented in a 2006 National Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) National Research Council (NRC) report. Fluoride poses risks to the thyroid gland, diabetics, kidney patients, high water drinkers and others and can severely damage children’s teeth. (11) At least three panel members advise avoiding fluoridated water.
“The NRC fluoride report dramatically changed scientific understanding of fluoride’s health risks,” says Paul Connett, PhD, Executive Director, Fluoride Action Network. “Government officials who continue to promote fluoridation must testify under oath as to why they are ignoring the powerful evidence of harm in the NRC report,” he added.
The Professionals’ Statement also references:
– The new American Dental Association policy recommending infant formula NOT be prepared with fluoridated water.
– The CDC’s concession that the predominant benefit of fluoride is topical not systemic.
– CDC data showing that dental fluorosis, caused by fluoride over-exposure, now impacts one third of American children.
– Major research indicating little difference in decay rates between fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities.
– A Harvard study indicating a possible link between fluoridation and bone cancer.
The Environmental Working Group (EWG), a DC watchdog, revealed that a Harvard professor concealed the fluoridation/bone cancer connection for three years. EWG President Ken Cook states, “It is time for the US to recognize that fluoridation has serious risks that far outweigh any minor benefits, and unlike many other environmental issues, it’s as easy to end as turning off a valve at the water plant.”
Adverse health effects of fluoride: http://www.FluorideAction.Net/health
References:
(1a) http://www.nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/Press%20Release.%20Fluoride.htm
(1) http://www.fluoridealert.org/communities.htm
(2) http://www.fluoridealert.org/cape.html
(3) National Kidney Foundation, “Fluoride Intake in Chronic Kidney Disease,” April 15, 2008
http://www.kidney.org/atoz/pdf/Fluoride_Intake_in_CKD.pdf
(4) “Adding fluoride to water supplies,” British Medical Journal, KK Cheng, Iain Chalmers, Trevor A. Sheldon, October 6, 2007
(5) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695947?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
(6) http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/2840202
(7) http://www.swabvt.org/node/300
(8) http://www.draytonvalleywesternreview.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1373584
(9) http://www.goskagit.com/home/article/commissioners_vote_to_halt_fluoride_program/
(10) http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20090303/NEWS0301/90303100/1009/NEWS01
(11) National Research Council (2003-2006): Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards
http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/epa/nrc/
(12) “State oral health director challenged over comments about fluoridation,”
March 10, 2009,by Kathryn Lucariello, Carroll County News
http://www.carrollconews.com/story/1509198.html
SOURCE: Fluoride Action Network http://www.FluorideAction.Net
[...] Safety and Efficacy of Water Fluoridation « Environmental Public … [...]